Page 146 - 4-сон
P. 146
nts taking place in the Ukraine could recur in Uzbekistan, as well. Apart from
this, in the news resources such as the United States’ “Voice of America”,
“Liberty” and catholicculture.org web-portal, the British “BBC”, the Russia’s
“RIA Novosti” and “Golos Rossii” (“Voice of Russia”) one can observe various
fabricated and negative materials on Uzbekistan(13).
In lieu of conclusion, it is worth underscoring that the need to elaborate the
methods and rules of shaping the image of newly independent states in global
journalism and realize them in practice in line with fitting into the period of
today’s information globalization period becomes urgent. Meanwhile, it is also
worth mentioning that the differences between the materials published in the global
media space and national mass media remain vast.
However, there is a lack of sufficient attention paid to the issues of
requirements and standards of fairness in creating the image of newly independent
subjects. A number of examples were given earlier to substantiate the aforesaid.
For that reason, the problem of diversity of attitudes in the foreign mass
media towards the reforms in Uzbekistan must be timely and effectively addressed.
To do that there is need to expand the scope of work with foreign correspondents
and usefully exploit the modern PR-technologies.
The analysis of problem of differences in the attitudes in the foreign mass
media towards the reforms being accomplished in Uzbekistan allows for the
opportunity to make the following general conclusions and put forward the
following proposals:
– the outcomes of immediate observation made during the past 25 years at
more than 20 countries of the globe reveal that the media in the West (the United
Kingdom, Germany and the United States) offer the one-sided critical stories, the
CIS (Russia, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Azerbaijan) reporters place
their attitudes in the stories changing alike the weather, whilst the Asian states’
(Japan, China, South Korea, India, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt)
newspapers print, mainly, the positive articles. For over the span of years such a
kind of trend continues to remain unaltered;
– at the moment the world media space is managed by the globe’s largest
information centers. Given such difficult state of affairs, the information, apart
from the high possibility of being targeted to a certain goal and being one-sided,
the news are disseminated to world public in the shape and substance as desired by
the very owners of the news agencies;
– such circumstance may do a harm not only to country’s external image, but
also its domestic one. Since various fabricated news flows nurture in citizens the
www.journal.fledu.uz 146
Илмий-методик электрон журнал
this, in the news resources such as the United States’ “Voice of America”,
“Liberty” and catholicculture.org web-portal, the British “BBC”, the Russia’s
“RIA Novosti” and “Golos Rossii” (“Voice of Russia”) one can observe various
fabricated and negative materials on Uzbekistan(13).
In lieu of conclusion, it is worth underscoring that the need to elaborate the
methods and rules of shaping the image of newly independent states in global
journalism and realize them in practice in line with fitting into the period of
today’s information globalization period becomes urgent. Meanwhile, it is also
worth mentioning that the differences between the materials published in the global
media space and national mass media remain vast.
However, there is a lack of sufficient attention paid to the issues of
requirements and standards of fairness in creating the image of newly independent
subjects. A number of examples were given earlier to substantiate the aforesaid.
For that reason, the problem of diversity of attitudes in the foreign mass
media towards the reforms in Uzbekistan must be timely and effectively addressed.
To do that there is need to expand the scope of work with foreign correspondents
and usefully exploit the modern PR-technologies.
The analysis of problem of differences in the attitudes in the foreign mass
media towards the reforms being accomplished in Uzbekistan allows for the
opportunity to make the following general conclusions and put forward the
following proposals:
– the outcomes of immediate observation made during the past 25 years at
more than 20 countries of the globe reveal that the media in the West (the United
Kingdom, Germany and the United States) offer the one-sided critical stories, the
CIS (Russia, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Azerbaijan) reporters place
their attitudes in the stories changing alike the weather, whilst the Asian states’
(Japan, China, South Korea, India, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt)
newspapers print, mainly, the positive articles. For over the span of years such a
kind of trend continues to remain unaltered;
– at the moment the world media space is managed by the globe’s largest
information centers. Given such difficult state of affairs, the information, apart
from the high possibility of being targeted to a certain goal and being one-sided,
the news are disseminated to world public in the shape and substance as desired by
the very owners of the news agencies;
– such circumstance may do a harm not only to country’s external image, but
also its domestic one. Since various fabricated news flows nurture in citizens the
www.journal.fledu.uz 146
Илмий-методик электрон журнал
